What Forbes Has to Say
- Share via
In a telephone interview Monday, Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes addressed some of the most controversial opinions from his magazine columns over the past twenty years.
On calling televangelist Pat Robertson a “toothy flake” in 1988: “I once was critical of Ronald Reagan, too. Well, [Robertson] ably represents a certain thought and viewpoint, and I respect that. But at the time he was a candidate.”
****
On recently saying he could support a balanced budget amendment after opposing it in the past: “It’s not so much a shift. It’s the fact that the way they had written the Balanced Budget Amendments in the past were a prescription for increasing the power of Washington . . . . That’s why I think the House Republicans had it right that it should have a tax-protection provision in it [requiring a three-fifths of Congress to raise taxes.]”
“I think we must have accompanying legislation to take care of things such as [the power of the] courts, unfunded mandates, making sure we distinguish between capital and expenses [in federal spending] . . . . Otherwise Washington . . . . will find ways to make a mockery of it.”
****
On his 1985 statement that illegal immigration supported “an important portion of this country’s prosperity”: “In the mid-1980s, there was a real labor shortage in much of the country and that’s what drew the illegals in...”
“There is a lot that can be done to cut the flow of illegals . . . . Beefing up Border Patrol . . . [and] a lot can be done to streamline deportation procedures. . . . I’ve never been in favor of trying the employer [sanction] route. Obviously that has not worked.”
****
On Proposition 187’s ban on public schooling for illegal immigrants: “They shouldn’t be here” illegally, but “I would rather have those people in school rather than roaming the streets.”
****
On admitting Taiwan to the United Nations: “I see no harm, especially when the Chinese are in a flexible mood . . . . I think that it is very important that we maintain trade with China, but that doesn’t mean we should stiff-arm the Taiwanese.”
****
On his 1987 column asserting that Americans were unlikely to support relegating abortion to the “‘back alley”’: “This gets to my whole thrust today. If you want abortions to disappear, you have to change the opinions, attitudes, consciousness of the American people. I think we have a consensus today to ban abortion in late term pregnancy, for purposes of sex selection, mandatory government financing and certainly [to support] parental notification. If we want to go beyond that we need persuasion.”
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.