Alabama No. 1 in BCS standings
- Share via
| TEAM | REC | AVG | AH | RB | CM | KM | JS | PW | ACR |
| 1. Alabama | 13-0 | 0.9978 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 1 |
| 2. Texas | 13-0 | 0.9433 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 22 | 21 | 23 | 3 |
| 3. Cincinnati | 12-0 | 0.8878 | 24 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 24 | 2 |
| 4. Texas Christian | 12-0 | 0.8836 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 5 |
| 5. Florida | 12-1 | 0.8637 | 22 | 23 | 22 | 24 | 24 | 22 | 4 |
| 6. Boise State | 13-0 | 0.8106 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 20 | t6 |
| 7. Oregon | 10-2 | 0.7568 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | t6 |
| 8. Ohio State | 10-2 | 0.6568 | 16 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| 9. Georgia Tech | 11-2 | 0.6471 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 8 |
| 10. Iowa | 10-2 | 0.6180 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 10 |
| 11. Virginia Tech | 9-3 | 0.5675 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 11 |
| 12. Louisiana State | 9-3 | 0.5375 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 9 |
| 13. Penn State | 10-2 | 0.5319 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 18 |
| 14. Brigham Young | 10-2 | 0.4531 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 15 |
| 15. Miami | 9-3 | 0.4419 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 13 |
| 16. West Virginia | 9-3 | 0.3357 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 |
| 17. Pittsburgh | 9-3 | 0.3141 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 20 |
| 18. Oregon State | 8-4 | 0.3876 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 9 | 17 |
| 19. Oklahoma State | 9-3 | 0.2628 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 21 |
| 20. Arizona | 8-4 | 0.2248 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 16 |
| 21. Stanford | 8-4 | 0.1803 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 22 |
| 22. Nebraska | 9-4 | 0.1655 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| 23. Utah | 9-3 | 0.1245 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 |
| 24. USC | 8-4 | 0.1207 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 19 |
| 25. Wisconsin | 9-3 | 0.1203 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
EXPLANATION The BCS Average is calculated by averaging the percentage totals of the Harris Interactive, USA Today coaches’ and computer polls. Six computer rankings calculated in inverse points order (25 for No. 1, 24 for No. 2, etc.) are used to determine the overall computer component. The highest and lowest ranking for each team is dropped, and the remaining four are added and divided by 100 (the maximum possible points) to produce a Computer Rankings Percentage. The six computer ranking providers are Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin and Peter Wolfe. Each computer ranking accounts for schedule strength in its formula. | |||||||||
Go beyond the scoreboard
Get the latest on L.A.'s teams in the daily Sports Report newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
